Obama
campaign decries 'The New Yorker' magazine's satirical rendering as 'tasteless'
By Rick Bishop, News Lampoon
Editor-in-Chief

July 14, 2008--Wah-wah-wah!
Maybe you shouldn't have worn that ridiculous outfit when you took that
trip to Africa, you dumb ass! You looked like a short-order cook
slinging hummus in some shitty Sudanese diner. And maybe, since
you've always been such an ambitious son-of-a-bitch, you shouldn't have
married someone who talks and acts like she wants to beat the shit out of
every white person she sees.
And what is it exactly about the word
"satire" that has you so confused? Does it say anywhere that it's
nice? Who besides you wants to see "tasteful" satire?
Oh, wait, we get it now--you thought you and your big-mouthed wife were
somehow off limits. . . .
Welcome to the Big Leagues, asshole!
Bravo, New Yorker--your balls must
have grown back!
But what's with McCain and his spokesman with
the puppy-dog name, Tucker Bounds: “We completely agree with the Obama
campaign, it’s tasteless and offensive.”
"Offensive"? Did he say "offensive"?
Hey, shit-for-brains, it's satire! It's supposed to be offensive!
And by the way, it's not Obama they're trying to offend, it's you.
What, do you think The New Yorker is a conservative
magazine? But The New Yorker targets smart people, so you
wouldn't know.
Hey, McCain, are you trying to lose the
election? Or did Jesse Jackson cut your nuts out? If so, you'd
better follow The New Yorker's lead and grow them back. Until
you do, try to quit acting like a pussy, and just keep your mouth shut when
something good happens to you. This sensitive, take-the-high-road
crap is not only boring and stupid, it's fucking irritating.
The News Lampoon--Twisted News, Humor & Satire